ScrambleWatch Q&A: Republican Marilyn Zerull on Education

Marilyn Zerull is one of three Republican candidates running for a seat in Legislative District 26 House of Representatives. We asked her some questions on education policy.

Should the AIMS test remain a requirement for graduation?

I don’t really care for the AIMS test mainly because it tests after the fact. I would prefer testing during the school year. I believe if the curriculum was standardized, regular class room testing would indicate to the teachers and parents if a student was falling behind.

Do you favor any changes for the AIMS test?

I would favor a basics skills test like I was brought up with-one that is given a third of the way through the school year so you really get an idea of where each student is before it’s too late.

Do you support state-funded vouchers for private or religious schools?

Well, I feel that privately funded schools don’t need additional funding-of course religious schools and charter schools are different and although I’m not totally decided on that yet, I do believe in supporting them whether it’s with state funds or not.

Does the state need to spend more on school construction?

No. We have schools that are closing here in Pima County and well as in Maricopa County due to lack of children. I’m really in favor of redistricting and utilizing the schools we have. Now if some of them are old, I am in full favor of renovating but I think building new schools is a super waste of money.

Should school construction funds come from the general fund or would you prefer a new revenue source for school construction?

I think it should come from the general fund. I don’t think we need to increase the amount of money going for education especially this year. We need to delegate spending better.

Do you support merit pay for teachers?

Yes I do. I believe it would demand competition that would wind up improving the whole system.

How would you determine how merit pay was awarded?

I think that is something that has to be determined by the parents and the principal-they’re the ones who see the performance of the students.

Do you support sex-ed programs that include information on abstinence, contraception and HIV/STD prevention?

As long as it was age appropriate. I don’t support teaching about homosexuality, STDs and stuff like that in grade school-that could be brought up at the high school level. Further, it should first be up to the parents whether they want their children exposed to it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: