Pima County Attorney

Democrat Barbara LaWall, who is seeking her fourth term as the county’s top lawyer, faces Republican Brad Roach, a former prosecutor in her own office, and Green Claudia Ellquist, a longtime social-justice advocate who got about 7 percent of the vote in a 2004 campaign against LaWall.

Dave Devine covered the race for the Tucson Weekly:

Crime rates in Pima County–and how law-enforcement officials should be dealing with that crime–lead to one of the most contentious disagreements among the three candidates for county attorney.

Republican Brad Roach and Green Party nominee Claudia Ellquist are seeking to unseat Democratic incumbent Barbara LaWall.

“The crime rate can be lower, and we don’t have to accept it (being) as high as it is,” declares Roach, a 37-year old criminal lawyer now in private practice.

On his Web page, Roach provides a comparison of FBI violent-crime statistics from 2006. The rate shown for Pima County is 16 percent higher than that for the Phoenix metro region, and 25 percent above the United States average.

“Ten percent of criminals commit 85 percent of the crimes,” Roach suggests, “and the police fairly well know who they are. But we’re not targeting the right people and taking them off the streets.”

The 62-year old LaWall disputes Roach’s conclusions. She insists Pima County’s violent-crime rate has fallen by more than 21 percent since she was first elected in 1996.

“We have the best County Attorney’s Office in the state in holding criminals accountable,” LaWall proclaims. As proof, she cites a conviction rate of almost 94 percent, and says that 70 percent of the cases her office takes to trial involve dangerous criminals.

In tough economic times, Ellquist believes the County Attorney’s Office needs to pay more attention to where it is spending its limited financial resources. One focus of her campaign, as it was four years ago when she received 8 percent of the vote, is to push for a moratorium on seeking the death penalty.

“They’re three times as expensive,” Ellquist says of death-penalty cases compared to life-sentence cases. The 59-year old Ellquist, a longtime community activist, thinks this money can be put to better use.

“If the office has more financial resources,” Ellquist says, “it has more options. … Other programs could be expanded.”

LaWall talks with pride about several programs initiated while she has been county attorney, including Amber Alert and Safe Baby efforts. But she believes the death penalty must remain an option.

“I don’t think there’s an economic argument to be made here,” the incumbent says, adding that she doesn’t agree that death-penalty cases are more expensive. “It’s important to seek justice.”

How that justice is sought is another area of dispute between the candidates. While LaWall proudly lists her office’s high trial rate (compared to the number of cases plea bargained), both Roach and Ellquist criticize it.

“Trying cases is not a lot more expensive,” LaWall insists of her office’s practice. She indicates that 7 percent of cases now go to trial, one-half the percentage in 1996.

“The trial rate is politically set,” counters Roach, who used to work for LaWall before leaving the office in the wake of the Stidham murder trial. He says this trial rate costs Pima County taxpayers almost $3 million more when compared to the average trial rate of other counties.

Stating that he got into the race because of what he perceived to be “one blunder after another” by LaWall, Roach also says: “If the office’s attorneys were told they don’t have to go to trial to get ahead, they’d have time to look at other cases.”

Ellquist agrees the current trial rate is too high, and believes the office should more frequently consider treatment as an alternative to trials in drug cases.

“Instead of going to court, the county attorney should lobby for increased diversion opportunities,” she says.

“There are wide differences in the vision of what underlies the candidates in this race,” Ellquist adds. “There is a real decision to be made about what people want the county attorney’s office to be.”

For his part, Roach says: “The county attorney affects our lives so much more than people assume.”

LaWall says that she’s proud of her “record of success” before concluding: “I promise the people of Pima County effective protection that is fiscally responsible.”

Advertisements

8 Responses

  1. You sure didn’t write much on this race. What about all the scandals at the PCA office?

    Lawall has to go. Horrible, horrible, horrible. I will vote for the Green, the Republican ANYBODY but Lawall. You can’t get much worse than her.

  2. Well, FGHH, why don’t you enlighten us?

  3. Let’s make changes all around, County Board of Supes, and County Attorney.

    VOTE BRAD ROACH

  4. I agree w/FGHH, Lawall must go. On Dec. 18, 2005 I was in a victim of a Hit & Run accident that has ruined my back, gave me a concussion and caused other injuries. The young driver was apprehended a couple of miles away by a Border Patrol officer. The driver was driving on a suspended license & without insurance. There also was a 2-yr-old in the back seat. The county attorney’s office had this screwed up from the get-go, having scheduled the offender’s case in two different courts. Five months after the accident the toxicology reports came back as negative and the case was dropped by the CAO. I made many phone calls to the honorable (ugh) Ms. Lawall, none returned and even went to the downtown office, getting nothing but a run-around. I am nearly 54 and have never, ever voted for a Republican, but this streak will end this November. I would vote for the Green Party candidate but, sad to say, that would be a wasted vote. I urge all to consider a vote for Lawall, a person who appears to not want to do her job.

  5. A vote for Claudia Ellquist for County Attorney would much more than a “protest vote”. It would be a vote for more efficient, effective and humane criminal prosecutions in Pima County.

    Brad Roach would seriously increase the expense of running the office by trying to kill more defendants. He would continue the Republican ideal of locking everyone up at great expense, no rehabilitation efforts and continuing to ignore the root cause of crime. Brad, it’s the economy, stupid!

    Barbara has been there too long. It’s the only job she’s ever had and she’s so “institutionalized” that she cannot change or grow.

    The ONLY reasonable choice is Claudia Ellquist.

  6. “The reformative effect of punishment is a belief that dies hard, chiefly, I think, because it is so satisfying to our sadistic impulses.” – Bertrand Russell

    “Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so.” – Bertrand Russell

    Let’s stop dying and do some thinking…
    Claudia Ellquist vs. the duopoly Lawall/Roach, enough said: “Vote Claudia Ellquist for Pima Co. Attorney.”

  7. I’m pretty new to Tucson, but.. . .Barbara LaWall
    thinks death-penalty cases aren’t expensive? Is she insane, or just a liar?

    The “10 percent commit most of the crimes” line is a longstanding right-wing talking point. Ask him how he would deal with the other 90 percent, and watch his jaw drop.

    While I’m a little concerned about electing Roach, I think Ellquist is the best choice. It’s not a protest vote. It’s a vote.

    Think about it.

  8. Ellquist is right on with not pursuiing the death penalty AND also on seeking treatment agreements versus prosecution on drug offenders. LaWall’s office seeks way too many prosecutions on drug offenses and has a very high peition rate against juveniles and drug offenses.

    Vote Ellquist. If she gets 20% or so of the vote, that might be enough to get LaWall’s or Roach’s attention that a large group of people want fiscally responsible and socially relevant prosecuting decisions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: